Reputation Tower

Reputation Tower. Find it. Prove it. End it.

Reputation Tower is a reputation-intelligence platform. We find every reputational signal, verify what’s real, and secure your reputation using the same standards of proof used in legal and compliance investigations.

Confidential. No obligation.

Knowing exactly who you’re dealing with works.

Finding information isn’t the hard part. Trusting it is. Information about a person or a company never lives in one place. It’s scattered across public registries, news archives, court records, social media, and databases that aren’t public at all. And there’s more of it every year, coming from more places than anyone can really keep track of.

When someone runs a background check, they usually just pull all of this together. They might not check if that scary headline is actually about this person or company, or about some stranger who happens to share their name. They might not ask whether a story came from a real investigation or from a paid harmful media campaign made to look like one. They might not flag when a “source” isn’t a credible source at all. The file looks thorough. It rests on non-verified assumptions — and that gap is exactly where fabricated content turns into real damage.

That’s the part we actually do. We pull together what’s public and what isn’t, then work out what’s real, what’s just noise, and what belongs to someone else entirely. So the decision you make is based on what’s true, not on whatever came up first.

Fabricated content isn’t random. It’s a business.

Some of what you’ll find isn’t a stray bad review or an angry ex-partner — it’s a product. Networks of look-alike “news” sites publish the same fabricated story under dozens of different domains, then quietly offer to take it down for a fee. Paying doesn’t end it. It just confirms you’re worth targeting again, and the story resurfaces under a new domain a few weeks later. Knowing the difference between a real problem and a monetized one changes everything about what you should actually do next — and doing nothing isn’t free either: the longer it sits, the more places it gets copied to.

One engine, four steps

Detect → Adjudicate → Remediate → Monitor

Detect
We find everything — databases, search engine results, AI answers, image search, autocomplete, social media signals, and closed channels.
Adjudicate
We separate what's real from what's fabricated, score how serious it actually is, and produce a verdict your compliance and due diligence team can stand behind.
Remediate
We build the strategy: what needs correcting, what's outdated, what's fabricated and needs to disappear, and what an accurate, professional profile looks like once the work is done. A sequenced strategy built around your specific situation — not a generic checklist.
Monitor
The work doesn't end when the report does. Seven monitors on a single surface keep watching — portfolio-level risk across every subject, active narratives, AI-visibility shifts, and how ready each case file is if it needs to be shown to a bank or a court tomorrow.
See how each step works

We don’t grade our own homework.

Anyone can invent a “risk score” and ask you to trust it. Ours is checked against the same methodologies used by professional fact-checkers, court investigators, and international auditors — the experts whose job is catching exactly this kind of thing.

How we judge a source
NewsGuard, the Journalism Trust Initiative (the EU's own standard for this), the Global Disinformation Index, and the International Fact-Checking Network. These are the same frameworks used to tell real journalism apart from disinformation — we run every single source in your file through them, not just the ones that look suspicious.
Evidence that actually holds up
A screenshot isn't proof of anything on its own. Ours are timestamped with RFC-3161 — a trusted, tamper-proof time standard, not just your computer's clock — geo-tagged, hashed, and logged in an unbroken chain of custody. This is the same bar courts and regulators apply. Most reputation reports don't come close to it.
Checked, not just claimed
Two of our reviewers can look at the same case, working independently, and land on the same verdict — that's measured, not assumed (Cohen's kappa = 0.617, rated “substantial agreement” on the standard scale). The methodology itself gets assessed under ISAE 3000, the international standard for independent assurance, and is built to hold up under GDPR and the EU's Digital Services Act.

And when it’s time to check you against a bank’s own screening — World-Check, Dow Jones, LexisNexis — you’re not walking in with a story. You’re walking in with numbers that were built to survive exactly that conversation.

  • NewsGuard & Journalism Trust Initiative — source credibility
  • Global Disinformation Index & IFCN — disinformation pattern detection
  • RFC-3161 timestamping & chain of custody — evidence integrity
  • Cohen's kappa — inter-rater reliability
  • ISAE 3000 — independent assurance on the final report

Find it. Prove it. End it.

Tell us what you’re dealing with. We’ll show you what actually comes up, what’s real, and what to do about it.

Request a reputational audit

Confidential. No obligation.