Services
Twelve services, four steps, one engine.
Twelve services across the reputation loop — find what's out there, tell what's real, act on it, and keep watching. Built for the people who need to know, and the people who need to prove it.
OpenSelf-serve. Start it yourself in the platform and see the first result in the same session.
CoreRuns with our analysts, researchers and legal partners. It starts with a conversation, not a signup.
Step 1
Detect
We find everything — databases, search results, AI answers, image search, autocomplete, social signals, and closed channels.
We pull together exactly what a bank or partner's due diligence team checks — public registries and databases, media coverage, and what AI models like ChatGPT and Gemini say when someone asks about you directly. Not your own search — that one's personalized and shows you a different internet than the one they see. Theirs is the one that matters.
One client checked their own name and saw nothing unusual. Our audit found an AI assistant confidently repeating a years-old, already-corrected story as if it were current. A bank running the same check would have seen exactly that.
See what your name actually returnsWe run continuous online monitoring across every open platform — media, social networks, forums, review sites — built to catch a pattern at three or four related mentions, not after it's a headline. A handful of similar posts across unrelated accounts, all within a short window, is how a coordinated push actually starts. Catching it there is the difference between a five-minute fix and a six-month cleanup.
We've flagged coordinated posting patterns hours before the first article ran — early enough for a client to get ahead of the story instead of just reacting to it.
Ask about early-warning monitoringCompromat networks coordinate in private Telegram groups and invite-only forums before a single article ever goes live. We monitor those closed channels for early mentions of your name — not to buy leaked material, just to flag that something's already being put together.
Ask about closed-channel signalsStep 2
Adjudicate
We separate what's real from what's fabricated, score how serious it actually is, and produce a verdict your compliance and due diligence team can stand behind.
We score the source and the claim on two separate scales, the way intelligence analysts have done it for decades: how reliable is this outlet, regardless of how bad the story sounds — and how credible is this specific claim, regardless of who's telling it. Blend those into one number and you lose exactly the thing you needed to know.
In one file we reviewed, three quarters of what a standard audit flagged as “risk” turned out to be noise — other people who happened to share a name, and one fabricated story copied across dozens of domains.
Ask how we'd score your caseWe measure visibility and credibility separately, then combine them into a single, clear read — a real problem that needs a response, a coordinated smear that needs delisting, or background noise nobody should waste time on. You get one scored answer, not a long list of red flags to sort through yourself.
Request a scored read on your caseWe produce a report built the way due diligence and compliance teams already expect one to look — independently assessed under ISAE 3000, every judgment backed by evidence instead of opinion. It's the kind of document that ends the conversation instead of dragging it out.
Request a document that holds upStep 3
Remediate
We build the strategy: what needs correcting, what's outdated, what's fabricated and needs to disappear, and what an accurate, professional profile looks like once the work is done.
We can't take content down ourselves — only a platform, a search engine, or a court can actually do that. What we do is build the claim correctly, under the right country's rules, so it actually gets acted on instead of ignored. And when it's a coordinated network behind it rather than one article, we go after the infrastructure too, not just the link you happened to notice.
Talk to us about building your caseWe build your response with the same evidence discipline as everything else we do — sourced, timestamped, and ready to hand to a journalist or publish yourself. Not a defensive statement written to sound reassuring. A documented account someone else can actually check.
Build your documented responseWe build an accurate, professional digital profile from the ground up — the kind that shows up correctly in a search and gets represented accurately when someone asks an AI model who you are. This isn't repair work. It's doing it right from the start.
Build your profile the right wayStep 4
Monitor
The work doesn't end when the report does. Seven monitors on a single surface keep watching after remediation is done.
We keep watching after a case closes: mirrored copies, reprints under a different domain, the same fabricated story resurfacing months later with a new byline. Catching a mirror in its first week is a five-minute flag. Catching it after it's re-indexed is another case from scratch.
Ask about post-case watchingEvery case file stays current, not frozen at the date it was delivered — evidence, verdict, and status updated as things change, so when someone asks to see it, you're handing over today's answer, not last year's snapshot. Portfolio-level view for multiple subjects, one dossier readiness score, no scrambling to reconstruct what changed since the last report.
Talk to us about case readinessWe track shifts that a one-time audit can't see: a new narrative gaining traction, an AI model's answer quietly changing, a coordinated push building before it's public. Seven monitors on a single surface, watching all of it at once — so the next problem gets flagged while it's still small.
Ask about continuous monitoringQuestions people ask before they write to us
Can Reputation Tower guarantee that a page or an article is removed?
No. Only a platform, a search engine or a court can take content down. What we do is build the claim correctly, under the right country's rules, so it gets acted on instead of ignored — and when a coordinated network is behind it, we go after the infrastructure, not just the one link. Removal is prepared for human and legal review; outcomes are never guaranteed.
What is the difference between Open and Core services?
Open services are shipped and self-serve: you run them yourself in Mission Control, right now, without talking to anyone. Core services carry a human layer — analysts, lawyers, researchers — and are scoped in a conversation. Core is never sold self-serve.
Do you remove true stories about a client?
No. Findings backed by regulators, courts or credible outlets stay in the score. Only well-founded falsehoods and privacy violations proceed to remediation, and public-interest journalism is protected at the routing level before a case ever reaches remediation. This is not a whitewashing service.
How do you tell a real investigation from a fabricated smear?
Source reliability and claim credibility are scored on two separate scales (the Admiralty Code) and never blended into one number. Source credibility draws on NewsGuard, the Journalism Trust Initiative, the Global Disinformation Index and the IFCN Code of Principles; collection follows the Berkeley Protocol. Inter-rater reliability is measured, not asserted: Cohen's kappa 0.617.
Is a Reputation Tower report a KYC, AML or sanctions clearance?
No. We work with public-source signals to support human review. We do not provide KYC approval, AML or sanctions clearance, legal advice or certified scoring. A screening result says “No signals found in public scope” — never “cleared”.
Who are these services for?
Private individuals and family offices, banks and compliance teams, investigation agencies, law firms and legal partners, PR and reputation agencies, and OSINT professionals. Investment funds, holdings and multi-entity organisations are covered at portfolio level.
Not sure which one your case needs?
Tell us what you're dealing with and we'll point you to the right starting step — or run the first check with you.
Ask our expertConfidential. No obligation.