Remediate · Right of reply
Put your side on the record, with evidence
Silence reads as agreement. A sourced, dated answer an editor can check does not.
- Built from your documents
- You run it yourself
- Credits, not a subscription
- The deal closed in 2021Your contract, dated 2022answered
- The company was under investigationNo document either waycontested
- The decision looked recklessNot a factual claimopinion
- The filing was lateRegistry receiptaccurate
Each claim carries the paragraph and the document behind it
- Give it the articleIt is split into single claims, fact apart from opinion.
- Add your documentsEach claim is checked against what you hold.
- Take the document awayA right of reply an editor can verify.
It works from what you supply. It invents no argument.
A right of reply asks a newsroom for balance, not for deletion.
It produces the document and stops. Nothing recurring is set up.
What if I have no document for a claim?
It is marked as contested rather than answered. A gap you can see is worth more to an editor than a sentence that papers over it.
Will you send it to the newsroom for me?
No. You get the document. Approaching a publication is a decision with consequences, and a person makes it.
Does a true story get answered too?
Accurate reporting stays accurate. This is not a whitewashing service, and public-interest journalism is protected before anything reaches remediation.
Answer it with something an editor can check
Build your documented responseA stronger version, carrying a credibility verdict and a materiality read, is prepared by our analysts and lawyers.